Australian researchers question US parenting report’s accuracy
Jun14

Australian researchers question US parenting report’s accuracy

Author // Alex Dunkin Categories // News + Politics | National | ACT | New South Wales | Northern Territory | Queensland | South Australia | Tasmania | Sydney Mardi Gras | Victoria | Western Australia

A study released by the University of Texas reporting apparent negative effects for children of same-sex attracted parents has been criticised by Australian researchers and parents.

The report, authored by Mark Regnerus, is the largest population-based survey published in the July issue of Social Science Research and found that children born in the twentieth century to LGBT parents were worse off than children born from married, straight parents.

Regnerus insisted that the report did not show a causal link between having same-sex parents and negative outcomes in later life and said instability is a more likely cause of the negative experiences, including greater welfare dependency.

“Most conclusions about same-sex parenting have been drawn from small, convenience samples, not larger, random ones,” he said.

“The results of that approach have often led family scholars to conclude that there are no differences between children raised in same-sex households and those raised in other types of families. But those earlier studies have inadvertently masked real diversity among gay and lesbian parenting experiences in America.

“This study may not reflect the experience of younger children growing up today in same-sex families, particularly because society has become more accepting of gay and lesbian families in the last decade.”

Dr Simon Crouch of the Australian Study of Child Health in Same Sex Families (ACHESS) told GayNewsNetwork there was only a limited amount of outcomes presented in the report.

“It is important to note that data is only presented on 40 out of a much larger range of possible outcomes,” he said.

“The only explanation given for the choice of these outcomes is that they are "common and oft-studied." It begs the question why were other outcomes excluded and what do they show?

“Further to this there is limited (and selective) use of control data in the more complex analyses. It is interesting to consider that current financial factors, respondent's education level, place of residence etc. are not included as each of these is known to have significant impacts on a number of the outcome measures.”

Crouch added that the report’s main reference group was heterosexual families while the analysis of lesbian mother and gay father families included a diverse and heterogeneous grouping of multiple types and transitions.

“While there may be a number of stable families with same-sex attracted parents in this group there are also a large number of families that have experienced separation, multiple parental relationships and ongoing inconsistencies in domestic arrangements,” he said.

“In fact, given the legislative and social instability that many of these families experienced when the participating children were growing up the most useful conclusion that can be drawn from this study is that affording same-sex families legal and financial security through institutional norms such as marriage equality would likely be the best recourse for children with same-sex attracted parents.”

Crouch said an Australian study by ACHESS currently underway will better understand the current experiences of children in Australia aged between 0 and 17 who have same-sex attracted parents.

About the Author

Alex Dunkin

"Tall, dark and handsome", and a borderline coffee addict. Grew up in country South Australia prior to travelling and living overseas and then returning to the state to undertake university degrees in journalism and international studies with a focus on the Italian language. Constantly writing new material, both journalistic and creative, with a couple of recent awards under his belt including the youth prize in the New Mardi Gras literature prize.

Comments (3)

  • Stuart Baanstra
    15 June 2012 at 12:30 |

    Marco, the only reason people have "children" is because we're mortal, due to heterosexuality. Now, there's your "God", or lack of it.

  • Marco
    15 June 2012 at 04:19 |

    Mark Regnerus will conduct a study that will prove ACHESS is a very bad group and an abomination to God.

    Just you wait! ;)

  • Str8Grandmother
    14 June 2012 at 11:42 |

    Everyone NEEDS to understand that Dr. Regenerus did NOT study families with mommy+ mommy or daddy+daddy. In fact he only found out of his whole sampling, TWO straight up lesbian women who raised children and in an e-mail to me he says these children turned out GREAT! And he found no daddy+daddy.

    Dr. Regenerus's Respondents were raised in a MIXED ORIENTATION MARRIAGE (MOM), or a MIXED ORIENTATION SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP. A MOM is where one spouse is gay and one spouse is straight. That is who responded to this survey people who had parents in a MOM. Regnerus confirms that he found only 2 Respondents who were raised in a straight up lesbian or straight up gay home. Here is part of his e-mail to me which he asked me to post.

    [snip]"By the way, one of the key methodological criticisms circulating is that–basically–in a population-based sample, I haven’t really evaluated how the adult children of stably-intact coupled self-identified lesbians have fared. Right? Right. And I’m telling you that it cannot be feasibly accomplished. It is a methodological (practical) impossibility at present, for reasons I describe: they really didn’t exist in numbers that could be amply obtained *randomly*. It may well be a flaw–limitation, I think–but it is unavoidable. We maxxed Knowledge Networks’ ability, and no firm is positioned to do better. It would have cost untold millions of dollars, and still may not generate the number of cases needed for statistical analyses.[end snip] You can read the full e-mail exchange here-
    http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/06/11/45557

    We know that only 1/3 of Mixed Orientation Marriages attempt to stay together after disclosure and of that 1/3, only half manage to stay together for 3 years or more (and it goes really down hill after 7 years).

    FWIW I agree with Dr. Regnerus Mixed Orientation Marriages (or Mixed Orientation Sexual Relationships) that produce children are VERY BAD for the children. And that is what his study proves. It does not attempt and does NOT assess the outcomes of children raised by 2 loving moms or 2 loving dads. It.Does.Not.

    This pic by Rob Tisnai depicts this research perfectly. I know he will let you re-post it.
    http://wakingupnow.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/quit-damning5.png

Leave a comment

You are commenting as guest. Optional login below.


Cancel Submitting comment...